Back to Top

Monthly Archives: February 2007


Welcome, Kate! Tell us about your road to becoming a writer of Traditional Regencies for Cotillion.
I set my first two books Langley’s Choice (Zumaya Publications) and Restitution (Cloonfad Press) in Maryland since I live here and thought it would be easiest to research in my own backyard. It was tremendously interesting to research colonial life, but not as easy as I’d expected–although my experience as a living history interpreter helped–since Maryland has not traditionally received as much study as New England, Virginia, etc. The editor of my first book observed that it was obvious I was a Jane Austen fan, so I decided to try to write a Regency before the publishers dropped the lines entirely.
I was too late. By the time I had the story revised and ready to send out, the publishers had already frozen new acquisitions, and soon they announced the end.
I was surprised to learn that Ellora’s Cave decided to bring out a traditional Regency line–after all, they’re not known for books with lots of witty dialogue from fully clothed heroines. But not only are they launching the line, they’re really supporting it with ad money and an earlier than usual print launch. They’re fighting a tough battle though, because their main print seller, Borders, says they won’t stock traditional Regencies.

What’s your Cotillion debut, A Certain Want of Reason, about?
It’s the story of a guy who decides that the best way to get out of a bad engagement is to pretend he’s crazy. The heroine, who has spent most of her life watching out for a younger brother and sister who really do have mental issues, is somewhat less than pleased when she learns that the hero would stoop so low just to break an engagement. In a way, the book shows that everyone, certainly those in society, exhibit a want of reason at times.

How did you research the topic of madness and its treatment in the Regency, and what interesting facts did you turn up?
I found an excellent, detailed history of Bedlam, or Bethlem Hospital, as the institution prefers to be known. I had no idea that the facility began treating mentally ill patients back in the middle ages, nor had I realized that by the 18th century, the physicians actively worked to cure patients. I thought they just locked them up to keep them from bothering people. My research on Bethlem provided the date for the story–I decided it should be set soon after the hospital moved to St. Georges Fields, because the layout of the buildings at that location worked better for the scenes where the heroine and her friend disguise themselves as nuns to sneak her brother out. Thank heavens for inter-library-loans!

You’re a very diverse writer. Tell us about your other projects, and your next book.
I have a three-book series of contemporary cozy mysteries coming out with Barbour Books, but since they’ve pushed back the launch of their new mystery line until next year, I’ve been able to set those aside for a while to keep working on the historicals. (And I’ve managed to sneak history into the contemporaries as well. The first one, George Washington Stepped Here, deals with conflicts between living history interpreters at a historic site. And the sequel deals with an antique gallery.)
This May, I have a book coming out about another of my favorite subjects, pirates. (And I could go on for a long time, so I won’t even get started.) I had so much fun writing Avery’s Treasure (Zumaya Publications) that I felt rather let down when I finished the first draft. I wanted to crawl into the book and live there (probably because it’s set in the Caribbean and Bahamas while I’m stuck wintering much further north). Right now, I’m just finishing the first draft of the sequel to A Certain Want of Reason. This is the story of what happens to the sisters left behind in London while everyone else is breaking out of Bedlam, etc. It’s actually as much fun as writing about the pirates, but with no rum or tropical islands.

And the Riskies question: What are the risky elements of A Certain Want of Reason?
I think some of the subject matter is politically incorrect. There are characters in a rich asylum in the country playing chess with toys and bowling in the hallways, etc. I will make fun of anyone, if given the chance. Nothing is sacred.
The book is also risky because it’s ridiculous and unrealistic. It’s a goofy, silly, Wodehouse world, and the romantic relationship is probably not any more realistic than the rest of the book. I spend enough time in the real world. When I read or write, I want to go someplace else.

Come and chat with Kate–as usual, a question or comment makes you eligible to win a copy of A Certain Want of Reason, today only!

I know I’ve been quiet on RR this week, and haven’t even been visiting Go Fug Yourself or orlandobloomfiles.com. That’s because I’ve been deep in Writing Land, finishing the “Muses” WIP (rough draft done!!! Now in the ‘smoothing out’ phase). But even if you’ve been buried in a dark cave as I have, it can’t have escaped your notice that Valentine’s Day is coming up next week. When I went to Target to stock up on Choxie bars and Hello Kitty notebooks, I found the aisles full of heart-shaped candy boxes, heart-shaped pendants, and stuffed gorillas that sing “Wild Thing” when you press their paws.
I like the Big V Day as much as the next romance writer. After all, this is the time of year when newspapers, libraries, and bookstores come out of the woodwork wanting to do features on our books! Plus I love chocolate. And pink.
But (and maybe this is sour grapes, since I recently broke up with someone and it’s just me, Choxie, and Romeo and Juliet this year? Nah, can’t be that!) so much of this ‘manufactured romance’ seems the antithesis of real, true, personal romance. The prix-fixe dinners at fancy restaurants and mass-produced diamond chip hearts–they’re all sort of one-size-fits-all. What could mean real romance? What could be ultra-special?
A love letter, of course! Here are a few selections from some historical favorites for a bit of inspiration (courtesy of the book Love Letters, ed. Antonia Fraser):
From Jean-Jacques Rousseau to Sophie, comtesse d’Houdetot: “Come, Sophie…why should I spare you, whilst you rob me of reason, of honor, and life? Ah, much less cruel would you have been, if you had driven a dagger into my heart, instead of the fateful weapon which kills me! When you deigned to be mine, I was more than a man; since you have driven me from you, I am the least of mortals.”
Franz Liszt to Marie d’Agoult: “My heart overflows with emotion and joy! I do not know what heavenly languor, what infinite pleasure permeates it and burns me up. It is as if I had never loved!!! Tell me whence these uncanny disturbances spring, these inexpressible foretatstes of delight, these divine tremors of love. Oh! all this can only spring from you, sister, angel, woman, Marie!”
Robert Schumann to Clara Schumann: “I should like to call you by all the endearing epithets, and yet I can find no lovelier word than the simple word ‘dear.’ My dear one, then, I have wept for joy to think that you are mine, and often wonder if I deserve you. What would I not do for love of you, my own Clara!”
John Keats to Fanny Brawne: “You fear, sometimes, I do not love you so much as you wish? My dear girl, I love you ever and ever and without reserve. The more I have known you the more I have lov’d. In every way–even my jealousies have been agonies of Love, in the hottest fit I ever had I would have died for you.”
Lord Byron to Lady Caroline Lamb: “I was and am yours freely and most entirely, to obey, to honor, love–and fly with you when, where, and how you yourself might and may determine”
Lord Byron to Teresa Guiccoli: “I love you and you love me–at least, you say so, and act as if you did so, which last is a great consolation. But I more than love you, and cannot cease to love you”
Napoleon to Josephine: “I wake filled with thoughts of you. Your portrait and the intoxicating evening which we spent yesterday have left my senses in turmoil. Sweet, incomparable Josephine, what a strange effect you have on my heart!”
So, who are some of your favorite historical lovers? Anyone have any big plans for Valentine’s Day? Any suggestions for ways I could avoid the agonies of Internet dating??
And be sure and join us next Saturday, when Barbara Metzger will be joining us here for an RR interview!


I know this has been said by every generation, but geez, why is life so busy? And why do we feel so guilty when we take time for ourselves?

Today I have at least three (potentially) uninterrupted hours in which to write. And I already feel guilty about it–there is ALWAYS stuff I could be doing instead of writing, which is difficult, and doesn’t make my house any cleaner. The same feeling springs up, only worse, when I sit down to read–I don’t watch much TV, reading is my entertainment, and yet, whenever I read, unless I am also doing something else (at the gym, doing laundry, sitting with the son while he does homework), my mind buzzes with other things I could be doing.

When he was younger, my son liked to read a book called Take Time To Relax by Nancy Carlson which detailed the lives of the busy Beavers. They had aerobics, and cake-decorating class, and computer class, and working late, and all sorts of stuff that kept them on the go. When a big snowstorm hits, they’re stuck inside, so they pop popcorn and sing songs. When the roads are clear, and they could jump back into their busy lives, they decide to take more time for themselves.

I wish I was a beaver and had a big snowstorm trap me inside so I couldn’t do all the stuff that buzzes in my head. But since I am not (although, as previously noted, I have one enormous wood-chewing tooth), I have to force myself to relax. Which means turning off my brain and allowing myself to fall into the moment. So today I am going to do nothing but write and drink tea, at least for a few hours. Because I am busy, and must also schedule time for myself.

How do you take time for yourself? What are your favorite indulgences?

Megan
www.meganframpton.com

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | 6 Replies

I like food. I like to read about food and cooking although I rarely follow recipes. So I very much enjoyed this entertaining book by Ian Kelly (Diane blogged about his biography of Beau Brummell a few months ago) about the great chef Antonin Careme, who cooked not only for Napoleon but also for the Prince Regent (who was delighted to hire his rival’s chef), Talleyrand, the Rothschilds, and the Tsar of Russia.

It’s hard to believe it now, when reading Careme’s lavish recipes–for instance, Les Petits Vol-Au-Vents a la Nesle–that his techniques and innovations formed our modern dining experience. He introduced dining a la russe–that is, with food individually plated and served, which, by the end of the nineteenth century, replaced dining a la francaise (where the food was placed on the table and diners fended for themselves). He believed vegetables should be served slightly crisp and that cooks should wash their hands. He invented the chef’s toque. He cooked for kings but he came from very humble beginnings–like a Dickensian hero, he was abandoned when very young to fend for himself on the streets of Paris.

Early on he developed an interest in architecture, taught himself to draw, and later became famous for his extraordinaires–elaborate architectural centerpieces made of spun sugar. These huge, fragile masterpieces were recycled and in some cases outlived their creator, who succumbed, like many in his profession, to charcoal poisoning at a relatively young age.

This is the entire picture from which the cover art was created–the kitchen of the Royal Pavilion at Brighton, pretty much as it was during Careme’s time there (1816-1817)–the palm tree leaves were added later. The center table is a huge steam table to keep food warm.

You can visit the kitchen as it looks now–scroll down the page to look at a 360 panoramic view.

And if you’d like to buy the book, it’s on sale at a massive discount (along with many other goodies) at Daedalus Books.

I don’t think I’m going to attempt any of the recipes, even the simpler ones–and Kelly warns that the modern palate may find them a little bland. But I do like reading about food and life below stairs, so I really enjoyed this book. How about you? Are you a cookbook junkie? Have you ever attempted a historic recipe?

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | 17 Replies