From MS Encarta:
“Hydra (mythology), in Greek mythology, nine-headed monster that dwelled in a marsh near Lerna, Greece. A menace to all of รrgos, it had fatally poisonous breath and when one head was severed, grew two in its place; its central head was immortal. Hercules, sent to kill the serpent as the second of his 12 labors, succeeded in slaying it by burning off the eight mortal heads and burying the ninth, immortal head under a huge rock. The term hydra is commonly applied to any complex situation or problem that continually poses compounded difficulties.”
This is a pretty good description of how I’m feeling right now about researching my current mess-in-progress.
First, I actually do quite a bit of research ahead of time. This story has a balloonist hero so I read several books on the history of ballooning before I even started.
However, my plots are never that clear at the beginning so all sorts of questions crop up in the course of the writing. For instance, I hadn’t realized at the start that this hero was also an ex-soldier. Another area of research…sigh…but also a good excuse for viewing more Sharpe movies. ๐
But I try not to get side-tracked by research (easy to do with Sharpe!) so usually I just put in notes to myself for what to look up later. This week, since my kids are off school and it’s hard to get into scene-writing, I have started to look at all those notes and tackle some of them.
And I’m really starting to feel overwhelmed! In the course of the drafting I’ve learned that this hero is not only an soldier but he’s also an army brat. Now I have to figure out not only where he’s been and what he’s done but also where and how his father might have served. Then there are a host of things about the heroine, her background and her family that keep cropping up. I need to study up on all sorts of diverse subjects from the Clapham sect to the mating habits of British birds. Yikes!
It makes me start wondering why I keep getting myself into these messes. When these ideas come to me, are they the true whisperings of my muse or just some sort of literary death wish???
Some authors blithely write bestsellers without checking basic facts and their readers don’t mind a bit. Oh well, I can’t do that (though I make no claims to perfection in my research). The real reason I do it is because I can’t write with confidence otherwise. When I’ve exhausted the resources of the local university library, when I’ve pulsed the helpful members of The Beau Monde without getting a definitive reply, then and only then do I feel safe in just “making it up.”
So, my fellow writers, have you ever had a manuscript turn into this sort of monster? Have you found any ways to tame it? When do you fling up your hands and just make it up?
Dear readers, do all these historical details really add to your pleasure in a story? Please tell me they do!
Elena ๐
www.elenagreene.com
Elena, I apologize in advance for putting pressure on you, but as a reader, historical inaccuracies drive me up the wall. And this is given my miniscule knowledge. It feels like the author has betrayed a promise. I’m not saying a small oversight here or there; I’m talking about repeated egregious mistakes. So, I’m really glad you’re doing exhaustive research.
Coincidentally, Kalen blogged at the HistoryHoydens about liking heroes as ballonists. ๐
As far as my previous WIP was concerned… SIGH… everything that could go wrong with that monster, did. It was huge with sagging middles, and a hero whom I and the heroine really liked, but was too “ordinary” as compared with the exotic heroes of today’s hugely popular books. I could go on and on whining here. I can see Diane rolling her eyes, since I’ve complained to her in great detail, and more than once. That WIP has now been abandoned.
Coincidentally, Kalen blogged at the HistoryHoydens about liking heroes as ballonists.
Oh no, I don’t like him. The damn blighter just won’t shut up and go away. Every time I try to write something else he keeps popping in and telling me his story is so much better. Argh! At least I now know Elena can tell me what research books to start with . . .
Am I the only one who gets tortured by people who don’t exist? I canโt be.
I think accurate history is a real plus in a novel, Elena, even if the reader can’t spot an error. Lack of research leads to vagueness, as well as things that just don’t sound right (even if we don’t know why.)
So I, for one, think it’s great that you care enough to do all the research!
Cara
Am I the only one who gets tortured by people who don’t exist? I canโt be.
I look at it as having a large circle of imaginary friends, some of whom are annoying and pesky enough to turn into imaginary enemies.
And Elena, I too love it when it’s apparent the author has done her homework, even if it’s a topic I know nothing about (like ballooning!). The story feels richer and more solid somehow, and the writer’s enthusiasm for both her story and history shine through on the page.
I totally love books with accurate (and copious!) historical details, which may be why I’m on a historical fiction reading jaunt lately. ๐
Though for myself, I’m wondering why I always have to pick plots that require lots of new research! Right now I have several separate piles of research books around (pirates/Spanish treasure ships here, Henry VIII there, Versailles in the corner, 15th century Florence somewhere), and I’m losing my mind. ๐
Though for myself, I’m wondering why I always have to pick plots that require lots of new research!
Maybe your thought processes go like this:
“Should I write another book with
Shakespearian actors? Maybe… Or ghosts, and people from the West Indies? Maybe… Or how about Carnival? Ooh, I’d like to read that one! I don’t know much about Carnival! Okay I’ll write that one. Oh. Now I need to do research!” ๐
In other words, you’re writing the books you’d like to read — and you’d like to read them because you *don’t* know too much about the topic!
Cara
Keira, no apologies necessary!
It’s not actually the pressure to get historical details right that’s getting to me though. Amanda hit the nail on the head: it’s this compulsion to write about things I haven’t already studied. There ought to be a name for this malady, maybe even a support group. ๐
And Kalen, I’ll be happy to share resources whenever you’re ready. I will probably have a bunch more by the time I’m done with this mess!
Whew. I spent the day in my former life, back with my former co-workers.
Keira, we’ve all struggled with a book and with sagging middles. You are learning through this! Don’t get discouraged!
Elena, I too aspire to accurate research, but I know I don’t reach perfection. But there is nothing I like better than to feel I’ve put my characters in some sort of authentic situation. When the research fits the story, I really get jazzed!
Amanda, you are just cursed with loving too many time periods and having too many ideas!
Diane
Elena said, “There ought to be a name for this malady, maybe even a support group.“
Nope, but you have a cheering squad right here with the Riskies and all your readers. And we certainly don’t want you cured! We hope you’ll, er, succumb even more.
Amanda: Cara is right. A book about the carnival set in the Caribbean with cool dancing is the ticket. You’re already doing the research for it by watching Dancing with the Stars.
Thanks for your encouragement, Diane. Hope your visit with your former co-workers was fun.
Dontcha love it, though, when you stumble on a bit of research that goes eerily hand in glove with what you’ve already written?
It’s happened a few times. Gives me chills, good ones!
Keira I meant to offer sympathies on that earlier WIP. Once you’re away from it for a while you may find a way to go back and salvage the parts you loved.
Amanda, I’m longing to read all those stories of yours because of the new settings.
And Jane, I have definitely had some of those moments of serendipity. In my very first book, LORD LANGDON’S KISS, I came up with a description of the hero (an ex-cavalryman) and his horse. Later I opened up the Haythornthwaite book on British cavalrymen and there it was, an illustration of an officer in the exact same regiment that I’d picked. He and the horse looked eerily like I’d imagined.
I too aspire to accurate research, but I know I don’t reach perfection.
IMO there is no such thing. Just as soon as you send the galley off you’re SURE to stumble across some obscure fact you got wrong, causing agony. Nothing you can do about it. LOL!
Heck yeah all the research adds to the reading pleasure. . . heck, that’s why I read historicals, for the feeling and the details of the time! ๐
Lois