Let’s talk about–pacing. Not the sort I do on a treadmill (or should be doing–that 10 pounds won’t lose itself before RWA!). The kind that moves stories along. It all sounds dull, doesn’t it, especially compared with hunky heroes and sparkly dialogue, but it’s vital. Without the right pacing, Mr. Hunk is mired in the quicksand. When it’s ‘on’, hopefully the reader doesn’t notice it at all. They’re too busy skipping happily through the engrossing story. When it’s off–well, readers can feel caught in the quicksand, too.
Here is what made me think about it–movies. Two of them. I was watching the DVD of The Holiday. Amanda and Iris (aka Cameron Diaz and Kate Winslet) switch houses for Christmas, to get away from disastrous relationships, etc. Kate goes to Cameron’s fab mansion in L.A., Cameron to Kate’s ramshackle (but probably vastly expensive) cottage in Surrey.
There’s quite a bit I like in this movie. The two women are appealing characters, their stories interesting enough–I wanted them to find love and be happy! And, let’s face it, the Jude Law character is like my Ideal Man. He’s English, a book editor, has a terrific London house and 2 adorable daughters, and is funny and emotionally aware on top of it. Kate’s story involves a bit more wheel-spinning and a purported sort-of romance with Jack Black, of all people, but I like her. So far–good.
But, let’s talk editing. This movie tries to tell two stories, and yet the set-up alone takes nearly half an hour. We see what jerks the respective ex-boyfriends are (repeatedly), how neurotic Amanda is and how insecure Iris is (again, repeatedly). There are long scenes about the on-line house swap, driving to the houses, etc. I ended up fast-forwarding a bit here, and still had no trouble following the story at all. The set-up could have taken, oh, about ten minutes, and we would have gotten to Jude Law, I mean the rest of the story, sooner.
Contrast this with a gem I saw in the theater last weekend, Miss Pettigrew Lives for a Day. The roles, every one of them, were perfectly cast. From the leads (Amy Adams and Frances McDormand), to the so-called villain (the wonderful Shirley Henderson), to the men (2 Jane Austen film vets, Ciaran Hinds and Mark Strong, and the Pie Maker, er, Lee Pace. I knew from Pushing Daisies he was cute–now I see he’s sexy, too!). Every scene is vital to moving the story forward. Not a line of dialogue is wasted. The world of late ’30s London is beautifully built through sets and costumes. The actors can just be let loose into the story, and it all falls into sparkly (and ultimately very emotionally moving) place.
This pacing thing is something I really worry about as a writer. Where should the story even start? There’s always backstory a reader needs to know, but we don’t want to bore the snot out of them in Chapter One, and thus prompt fast-forwarding (like I did with The Holiday). Without a strict word count and some deadline structure, I do tend to meander a bit. I’m working on my Balthazar/1530s Caribbean book right now. I did lots of research for this one, on ships, life in the islands, nautical charts, pirates, etc. In addition, the characters have rather, um, complicated pasts (and personalities!) that are important to their relationship now.
How much of all this do I put in? When? What’s really important, and what’s just my half-hour set-up? I struggle a bit with this these days. But I do get a great deal of inspiration from looking at images like this one of Orlando!
So, I need your help. What do you like to see in stories? What can you do without? What makes you fast-forward through movies or books? And have you seen The Holiday or Miss Pettigrew (I recommend both, BTW!)??
Happy Easter, everyone! Save me some Cadbury Caramel eggs. And a Godiva chocolate bunny. (Oh, and Keira informed me that A Sinful Alliance is now being shipped from Amazon! Yay! Next Saturday join us for a chance to win an autographed copy–but if you can’t wait…)
It’ll be a while before Miss Pettigrew comes out on DVD. Boo.
My pet peeve in moves is the fake sex. Why bother? At home, I always fast forward it. i’m not talking about the hot anticipation or the kisses. I’m talking about the later action. A yawner for me.
As far as chocolate Cadbury eggs and such go, Miss Wee will have some with your name on them. We hope to do some coloring tomorrow. We’re also going to early Sunday morning mass.
I will be doing some egg coloring of my own this afternoon! I found a Hello Kitty egg color kit at Target, yay. π
Fake sex–LOL! A good thing about both these movies is that there isn’t any of that. There are kisses, and some implied, er, action (after the fact!), but that’s about it. The “If I Didn’t Care” number in “Miss Pettgigrew” was very romantic.
I’m eager to see Miss Pettigrew Lives for a Day. Having recently seen Enchanted, I’m a Amy Adams fan. Just bought the DVD of Enchanted at Target and I didn’t buy ANY Easter candy. Yay me.
Re: pacing. I haven’t seen either movie so I can’t comment on that, but pacing does bother me in movies. Like Dances With Wolves. My gosh, that movie is boring…because of pacing, I think.
I worry about it in my books, too. Above all I don’t want to be boring. When I’m bored in a book (frequently in the love scenes) I skip pages until something is happening in the story. I don’t want anyone skipping pages in my books, even in the love scenes.
In my own reading I don’t like lots of dialogue that rehashes things, or that goes on and on. I don’t like internal dialogue that does the same thing. Endless rumination bores me. I don’t like long descriptive passages either. I find I can get the gist of a story by reading one sentence of each paragraph or one paragraph on a page and when I start doing that, I know the book isn’t for me. When I don’t do that and I read every word, then I’m caught up in the story-world.
(2 Jane Austen film vets, Ciaran Hinds and Mark Strong, and the Pie Maker, er, Lee Pace. I knew from Pushing Daisies he was cute–now I see he’s sexy, too!)
I’m hoping to see Miss Pettigrew today — nice to know it has Ciaran Hinds and Lee Pace in it!!! Now I really want to see it.
Though maybe I’d better not mention its Lee Pace-ness to Todd… he doesn’t understand that when we watch PUSHING DAISIES and I say “Oh, that Ned is so adorable” that of course I mean adorable like a fluffy bunny, not adorable in any way that should make a husband no longer wish to watch Pushing Daisies quite so often… π
Cara
I’ve been working on pacing in my current book — I have to cut 10,000 words and found that I could take out whole scenes (even a chapter) and not hurt the story. Hurt my writer’s feelings a tad but then I got over it π
I’m waiting for Miss Pettigrew to come to my town — it may be out in DVD before then! The previews looked wonderful and I’ve been an Amy Adams fan since Enchanted also. The Easter bunny is delivering a copy of Enchanted for me on Sunday, I heard. The kids will be getting the candy.
(I’m trying this again — I ended up anonymous last time. My computer crashed last week and I’m slowing trying to recover everything. Thanks for the patience.)
And a Happy Easter to all who celebrate.
Thanks for the tips – I will look out for both these films – to watch for research purposes, obviously!
Yes, pacing is important if we are not to drive the readers to skip pages or, even worse, put the book down. However, I think that changes of pace are important too – sometimes it’s good to slow down a bit!
Regards
Melinda Hammond from snowy UK and yes, Surrey cottages are devilishly expensive!
Hmmm. I need to take notes here. I know for sure that there will be whole scenes and maybe even chapters that will be cut from my novel in revisions. It may hurt my writer’s feelings as well, but writing a boring book will hurt them more. Now to snag some Godiva’s from my Easter basket (thanks, Mom – Hey as long as I keep believing I keep getting a basket. Get the picture?) and read through to 100K plus words of my novel and figure out if I am boring!
“I will look out for both these films – to watch for research purposes, obviously!”
Oh yes, definitely for research ONLY, not for good-looking actors. No. π But I do find when I’m watching a movie that almost works for me but not quite, I start analyzing. And when something DOES work, I analyze after. (BTW, I sat down and watched Enchanted again this afternoon–soooo adorable! I also really liked Amy Adams in “Junebug”, which I think she was Oscar-nominated for…)
“of course I mean adorable like a fluffy bunny, not adorable in any way that should make a husband no longer wish to watch Pushing Daisies quite so often”
LOL, Cara! I thought the same thing, and “Miss Pettigrew” made me look at him–differently. π Can’t wait for new episodes of Pushing Daisies!
“In my own reading I don’t like lots of dialogue that rehashes things”
Ah yes, the plots where something happens, then the heroine thinks about it. Then the hero. Then maybe the heroine tells her BFF about it. Ack!!!
Cara wrote:
Though maybe I’d better not mention its Lee Pace-ness to Todd… he doesn’t understand that when we watch PUSHING DAISIES and I say “Oh, that Ned is so adorable” that of course I mean adorable like a fluffy bunny, not adorable in any way that should make a husband no longer wish to watch Pushing Daisies quite so often… π
Uh-huh. Fluffy bunny. Right. I totally see that.
And I want you to know, I just think of Anna Friel and Kristin Chenoweth as two…er…cuddly little kittens. Yeah, kittens, that’s the ticket!
Todd-who-is-very-fond-of-kittens
Amanda, I too loved Miss Pettigrew lives for a day, and now I want to read the book and I want to live in Amy Adams apartment in the movie and wear all the clothes!