Back to Top

Monthly Archives: April 2008

If you want to see all of this picture, go on over to the Wet Noodle Posse blog where today I’m blogging about conflict. (And if you’ve ever wondered, when you google for Darcy wet shirt you will come up with about 102,000 hits and 16, 700 under google images.)

So is it too easy?

We have so much information at our fingertips and the actual process of writing itself is so easy–cut n paste, cut, copy, and so on–that I wonder if we’ve lost something in the process. Consider Jane Austen who had limited amounts of time (well, that hasn’t changed much), and wrote in a room that was shared by family members. Paper was expensive. It was important to get things right the first time–or almost right. How many of us would have started writing without a computer? (To answer my own question: I’m not really sure.)

I think the challenges we have now (along with the same old same old of lack of time, family obligations, and having to make a living as well–or relying on someone else to do so) are more insidious. Do we suffer from a surfeit of riches–too many resources, too much advice, and do you think it’s harmful?

It seems ironic that writing, an essentially solo operation, now has become a community, if not team, activity. It’s much easier to talk about writing than do, too easy to go online to see what others are saying and thinking. Some is useful. A lot, in my opinion, is damaging.

For one thing, it stops you from writing, from actually doing the work. And I’m one of the worst offenders, ever. The temptation to just hop over to see what’s happening at a blog (this one, say) and then you follow a few links and before you know it hours have sped by… The other point is that not all information is equal, particularly online where opinion and information seem to overlap; where the trivial and the significant get mixed into one big internet stew.

And the worst thing of all–if you take too seriously what others are doing or saying, you can lose faith in your own work. Actually, two worst things of all. Take all the advice, or try to, and you’ll end up with something lifeless that just isn’t good enough.

So what do you do to protect yourself and spend your time wisely? What are your favorite places online that you feel are useful and reliable? And do you feel the need to limit your time online, and if so, how do you do it?

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | 11 Replies

I love makeover shows. I’d like nothing better than to wake up some morning and be ambushed by Stacy and Clinton to go off on a $5000 shopping spree in NYC. At this point, I’m probably not enough of a fashion disaster to make the cut. But there was a time when my children were small, sleep was scarce and my beauty regimen consisted of showering. When I watch these shows I can definitely relate to some of the moms in their baggy sweatpants and bad 80s jeans!

But once in a while, when friends of the fashion victim say she deserves the makeover because “she does everything for others and never thinks of herself” it almost seems like a reward for martyrdom. It almost makes me want to go back into those Mom Jeans and see if someone will nominate me! 🙂

Which makes me think about the Caregiver Heroine. In Regencies, this is often the lady whose father gambled away the family fortune. Now she’s taking care of the estate and a bunch of younger siblings. Maybe she’s selling herself into marriage with a wealthy rake (or even submitting to a Fate Worse Than Death). Or she’s scrimping and saving so a younger sister can have her London Season. Georgette Heyer’s FREDERICA is a classic example.

With caregiver heroines the hero can provide that whole take-me-away-from-it-all fantasy which can be fun. On the other hand, the caregiver heroine can be a cliché, a shortcut to characterization. I’m glad to see that more recent releases feature heroines who are striking out for themselves in some way.

A caregiver heroine can still work for me, though. It’s part setup and part attitude. I want to know she really doesn’t have better alternatives and isn’t just enabling poor Papa’s gambling problem. At least let her be angry with him about it! I want to know she’s not putting her own needs on a backburner just because she doesn’t value herself. FREDERICA works because the heroine is a happy person. She enjoys the shopping and parties involved in giving her sister a Season; I’m sure she’ll have even more fun once her burdens are lightened.

So what do you think? Do you enjoy reading about caregiver heroines? Do you have any favorites? Where is the boundary between a heroine who is bravely dealing with a difficult situation and one who is just making a martyr of herself?

Elena

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | 18 Replies

Welcome to the Risky Regencies JANE AUSTEN MOVIE CLUB!

Today we’re discussing the new BBC adaptation of SENSE AND SENSIBILITY.

Or, at least, we’re discussing the first half of it. We’ll discuss the second half next Tuesday!

So…what did you think of the casting, costumes, carriages, country-dances, or anything else?

To aid the discussion, here are the major credits:

Screenplay: Andrew Davies

Director: John Alexander


CAST:

Marianne Dashwood: Charity Wakefield

Elinor Dashwood: Hattie Morahan

Margaret Dashwood: Lucy Boynton

John Dashwood: Mark Gatiss

Fanny Dashwood: Claire Skinner

Mrs. Dashwood: Janet McTeer

Colonel Brandon: David Morrissey

Edward Ferrars: Dan Stevens

The non-horrific-looking Dan Stevens has recently appeared in television adaptations of both FRANKENSTEIN and DRACULA.

Robert Ferrars: Leo Bill

Lady Middleton: Rosanna Lavelle

Mrs. Jennings: Linda Bassett

Sir John Middleton: Mark Williams

Are you wondering why Mark Williams looks familiar? He plays Arthur Weasley in the HARRY POTTER movies. He was also seen in the recent TRISTRAM SHANDY (a.k.a. A COCK AND BULL STORY.)

Charlotte Palmer: Tabitha Wady

Miss Steele: Daisy Haggard

Lucy Steele: Anna Madeley

Mr. Palmer: Tim McMullan

Willoughby: Dominic Cooper

Fans of BECOMING JANE’S James McAvoy may have seen Dominic Cooper in STARTER FOR TEN; Cooper also gained notice in HISTORY BOYS. Later this year he will appear alongside Keira Knightley in THE DUCHESS.

Eliza: Caroline Hayes

Mrs. Ferrars: Jean Marsh

So…please let us know what you thought of it!

All opinions welcome!

(And if you’re interested in finding out which Austen adaptations we’ve already discussed, and adding your point of view, just click on the “Jane Austen Movie Club” link below!)

Cara
Cara King, who has more sense than sensibility…and more hair than wit…

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | 29 Replies