Lindsey Hutchison, you’re our winner!
Please send your snailmail to riskies AT yahoo.com so you may receive your signed copy of Heiress in Love
Lindsey Hutchison, you’re our winner!
Please send your snailmail to riskies AT yahoo.com so you may receive your signed copy of Heiress in Love
M.O.M knows best … sometimes. We’re thrilled to welcome to the Riskies debut author Christina Brooks with her new release HEIRESS IN LOVE, and she’s offering a signed copy to one lucky commenter!
Christina, welcome and tell us about your book.
Hi Riskies! Hi Janet! Thanks so much for having me with you today. The blurb says it so well:
When the Ministry of Marriage arranges a match, all that matters is power, wealth and prestige. In the business of marriage, there is no room for love. But even the most prudent plans can go awry…
A Convenient Marriage
Jane, Lady Roxdale, has endured one marriage of convenience decreed by the Ministry of Marriage. While she deeply regrets her late husband’s death, she is relieved to be free at last. But when a dissolute rake threatens everything Jane holds dear, she must contemplate marrying a second time…
An Inconvenient Passion
Disgraced libertine Constantine Black inherits his cousin Roxdale’s land and title–while Roxdale’s prim widow is left all the wealth. Constantine is not a marrying man, but wedding Jane is the only way to save the estate from ruin. Jane resists the smoldering heat between them, desperate not to fall in love with an unrepentant rake. But for the first time ever, Constantine wants more than seduction. He wants all of her–body, heart, and soul…
How many books are in the series and who’s up next?
At the moment, I’m contracted to write three books in the Ministry of Marriage series for the Westruther cousins. HEIRESS IN LOVE (Jane’s story, 28 June 2011), MAD ABOUT THE EARL (Rosamund’s story, 3 January 2012) and A DUCHESS TO REMEMBER (Cecily’s story, July 2012). I hope the series goes on for another three books so I can write the Westruther men’s stories, too.
As you know we’re research geeks here, so please share any interesting research that came your way when you were writing the book.
I researched quite a bit about the Cotswold woollen mills, which were surprisingly handsome buildings, and a lot about the region’s sheep which didn’t make it into the book. I’m sure readers will be relieved to hear that! It’s amazing how serendipity plays a part in the writing of novels. It rained non-stop where I live while I was writing this book and the rain found its way into the book itself. I wanted a local disaster to occur and in the course of my research I discovered an interesting tidbit. Often, a number of mills were built along the one stream and some unscrupulous mill owners would dam the stream on their property to stop the water flowing to other mills downstream, thereby putting those other mills out of business. This dovetailed nicely with the incessant rain that was already a theme in the book and the resulting flood is a huge turning point for my hero. I suppose that’s a spoiler but not a fatal one, I hope!
What do you love about the Regency period?
I love the clash between romantic idealism and the importance of making a good match–that’s what Pride and Prejudice is all about, after all. By contrast to modern times, where we all seem to air our every thought and whim on a daily basis through Twitter and Facebook, there is a lot of constraint placed on lovers in the Regency era. I love the intensity of romantic conflict that seems to go hand in hand with that constraint. I also enjoy finding a way for my heroine to be an independent thinker with a sure sense of self-worth without the crutch of a career to fall back on. It forces me to think hard about what it is that makes my heroine–or any woman–fulfilled.
I also admire what you might call ‘Regency style’ — the fashion, the interiors, the classical elegance of the era. And I love the dry wit and banter that seems to fit so well into Regency historicals.
What don‘t you love about the Regency period?
Finding an appropriately foul swear word for dire occasions that is also true to the era is terribly difficult! “Damn” sounds quite tame to the modern reader. I also have an ambivalent relationship with the rigid class structure of the period. Of course, the fantasy of having wealth and servants at one’s command is part of the lure of the Regency historical but sometimes I find the enormity of that disparity uncomfortable. I think perhaps as a result of that, my books focus on the romantic relationship against the backdrop of family, not against the backdrop of wider social concerns. I feel that any ‘solution’ I presented to those social problems would seem trite. And you do need resolution in romance novels, I think, or at least, in the kind of romance novel I write.
What writers have influenced you?
When I was ten or so, I saw the play version of Pride and Prejudice and fell instantly in love with both Austen’s writing and the era. My mother introduced me to the Brontes and Georgette Heyer. Thackeray’s Vanity Fair is a favorite, and Fielding’s Tom Jones, too. I think Susan Elizabeth Phillips writes magnificent heroes and wonderfully satisfying romance. I learn more from her every time I read her books.
What book are you currently reading?
I always have more than one book on the go. At the moment, I’m reading Tess Gerritsen’s STOLEN, Julie Ann Long’s I KISSED AN EARL, Elizabeth Peters’ RIVER IN THE SKY (on audio book) and Donald Maass’s WRITING THE BREAKOUT NOVEL (which I’ve read several times).
What’s your ideal research trip?
Oh, where to start!? My current WIP is set in London, so I think I’d probably begin there. There is an excellent book called something like Georgette Heyer’s Regency London. I’d love to visit every place in that book! I’d probably go up to Scotland, too, as I’ve never been there and my grandmother was half Scot by blood but wholly Scottish in her heart *G*.
Whose portraits did you use for the Westruthers section on your Ministry of Marriage page?
I had to quickly chase these details down again so I hope I have them right! The Duke of Montford is actually William Wilberforce, by Thomas Lawrence. Lady Jane Westruther is the Duchess of Berry (Lawrence), Lady Rosamund Westruther is Jane Digby. I’m not as happy with the men’s portraits. It’s not easy to get men as devastatingly handsome as I imagined my Westruther men! But the Earl of Beckenham and Viscount Lydgate are unknown miniatures I found on the internet (I think) and the Marquis of Steyne is David Lyon by Lawrence. I can’t seem to track down Lady Cecily’s name, just that it is a portrait of a ‘young girl’ again, by Lawrence. That one is my favourite — the young girl’s personality leaps off the page.
Thank you for having me on Risky Regencies today! I would love to ask your readers a question:
If you were a heroine in one of my novels and your marriage was being arranged, what’s the one quality in your husband that is not negotiable? One lucky reader will win a signed copy of HEIRESS IN LOVE!
I usually write my posts earlier in the week, but it’s been a busy week so here I am trying to blog off the cuff. I don’t do it as well as other Riskies, but I’ll try!
I’ve been continuing to work hard on my balloonist story. Since I started again on it this spring, I’ve heavily edited the first half that I’d written earlier. Recently, I got to the chapter I was on when my husband suffered his stroke. Chapter 13 that is. And I struggled with it just as I struggled with Chapter 13 in my last full length romance. I’m not superstitious. Actually, I think my longer stories tend to hit a major turning point around that spot and so it takes more rewrites to make it work. I’m happy with it now and forging on, getting close to the really fun balloon stuff.
Since it’s hard to read the dialogue in this Regency cartoon online, I will tell you that the lady is saying “How it rises!” and the gentleman agrees “It ascends exquisitely!” Yup, about right. 🙂
At the same time, I’ve been busy continuing to look into art for reissuing my backlist and musing more on the issue of how and why covers should convey the level of sensuality of the story. I’m an eclectic reader and have enjoyed anything from the sweet traditional Regency to erotic romance. I’m fine as long as the characterization is good. But many readers seem to be like me when I go to our local pub that has the best Buffalo Wings in the area. I order only the medium wings, because anything less is kind of boring and anything more has me in tears. Maybe that’s what it is for some readers? Anyway, I’m continuing to look for different treatments for my reissues, because they range from my first book, which was on the sweet side, to my last, which was a Super Regency and had sex scenes that horrified the traditional Regency purist.
I’m looking forward to summer. Although I’m not going to RWA this year, I’m eager to start a new writing schedule. Since I won’t be so busy in the morning getting my kids ready for school, solving fashion emergencies and locating lost footwear, I can take that hour (while it’s quiet and cool) to write. Since I’m a morning person, I’m really happy about that.
So how about you? What have you been busy with? Anyone superstitious about the Number 13? Do you like your chicken wings or your romances at just one level of heat? And are you looking forward to summer?
Elena
In two weeks, Liz Maverick and I will be presenting a workshop on social media during RWA’s National Conference. It’s titled:
Tweet it, Blog it, Face it: Self-Promoting with Social Media
and it’s all about, yeah, how writers might use social media to promote themselves and their work.
So–as an author, what would you most like to know how to do? What to do? When to do it?
Thanks for the help!
Given the choice between the Battle of Waterloo and father’s day, dads win hands down. I’ve blogged before about the horrible casualty rate of that day and, although we’ve made a big celebration of Waterloo in the past, I think we should remind both his grace and his excellency not to stage a major battle two weeks before RWA Nationals!
So, fathers. They don’t do too well in fiction. In the words of Katha Pollitt, in her poem ReReading Jane Austen’s Novels, Papa’s/a sort of genial, pampered lunatic, and I think that’s a tradition that’s stuck with us. Some do it better than others–Miranda Neville‘s brilliant Mr. Montrose and his weighing fixation, for instance, in The Dangerous Viscount. He is, unlike most of Austen’s fathers, mostly harmless.
Quoting Katha Pollitt again, This time round, they didn’t seem so comic. So let’s take a look at Austen’s fathers, surprisingly creative for a woman whose own father was intelligent, affectionate, and well-respected.
Dead and/or fiscally irresponsible. Mr. Dashwood, you really should have sorted out the business of your wife’s and daughter’s inheritance rather than leaving it up to your son and his wife. Mr. Bennet, get out of the library and see to your investments. Mr. Price, put that bottle down now and give Mrs. Price a rest (if you know what I mean and I think you do). And would it kill you to lend a hand around the house?
Generally unpleasant. Sir Thomas Bertram, I’ve always thought you’re a bit creepy in your interest in Fanny Price. Back off! General Tilney, you’re a jerk. You may have thought Catherine an airhead but she wasn’t that far off the mark, despite her head being filled with gothic nonsense. Sir Walter Elliot, you’re just plain dumb, and you should listen to Anne for a change.
Weird. Verging on the monstrous, yes, I’m talking about you, Mr. Woodhouse. You’d only be happy if you could imprison your daughter for life in your fantasy world of fear, besieged by illness and bloodthirsty foxes. After all, the chickens may only have been the beginning… Two got away (one daughter and one governess) and you don’t want to let Emma go. In your way you’re almost as bad as General Tilney.
Mostly harmless. Only one comes to mind, The Rev. Moreland. (Can you think of any more?)
Do you have any fictitious fathers you love to hate or, gasp, even any favorite fathers in Austen or romance?