Back to Top

Author Archives: Myretta

About Myretta

Myretta is a founder and current manager of The Republic of Pemberley, a major Jane Austen destination on the web. She is also a writer of Historical Romance. You can find her at her website, www.myrettarobens.com and on Twitter @Myretta.

And happy Mother’s Day to all the mothers reading this. I thought I’d share a blog originally published at Heroes & Heartbreakers for Mother’s Day 2011.

ppv1n13sMothers don’t often fare well in Jane Austen’s world. In fact, many have been buried by the time we meet their offspring. Emma Woodhouse’s mother has been long gone by the time we meet her managing younger daughter and, as Persuasion begins, Lady Elliot is a mere memory to poor Anne, left to contend with her self-involved father and sisters.

Of the living, in Mansfield Park, Fanny Price’s slatternly mother has sent her off to live with her aunts and uncle, most of whom see her as unpaid help (if they see her at all). In Sense and Sensibility, poor Mrs. Dashwood is deprived of her entailed home and comfortable income after the untimely death of her husband and goes to live in a cottage where she pretty much gives over the role of caretaker to Elinor, her eldest daughter.

Catherine Morland appears to have a loving and reasonable mother (a rarity among Austen mothers), but we don’t see much of her. She sends her daughter off with friends to visit Bath and then to Northanger Abbey. When, later, Catherine is unceremoniously dumped in a coach and sent home in the middle of the night, Mrs. Morland greets her with open arms and puts her expulsion from the abbey in the best possible light

“Well,” continued her philosophic mother, “I am glad I did not know of your journey at the time; but now it is all over, perhaps there is no great harm done. It is always good for young people to be put upon exerting themselves; and you know, my dear Catherine, you always were a sad little scatter–brained creature; but now you must have been forced to have your wits about you, with so much changing of chaises and so forth; and I hope it will appear that you have not left anything behind you in any of the pockets.”

This Mothers’ Day, however, we are sending flowers to Pride and Prejudice’s Mrs. Bennet of Longbourn, mother of five daughters, possessor of frayed nerves and querulous arguments, future mother-in-law to Fitzwilliam Darcy.

“Why?” you ask. Why send flowers to Mrs. B? She’s one of the most annoying creatures in all of Jane Austen’s novels, an assessment with which her long-suffering husband would probably agree.

Had Elizabeth’s opinion been all drawn from her own family, she could not have formed a very pleasing picture of conjugal felicity or domestic comfort. Her father, captivated by youth and beauty, and that appearance of good-humour which youth and beauty generally give, had married a woman whose weak understanding and illiberal mind had very early in their marriage put an end to all real affection for her. Respect, esteem, and confidence had vanished for ever; and all his views of domestic happiness were overthrown.

Yes, that Mrs. Bennet, the best mother in all of Jane Austen’s novels. Sure, she’s not the brightest candle in the chandelier. I imagine her voice to be like Alison Steadman’s in the 1995 Pride and Prejudice (the one with Colin Firth): high and screechy. She’s enough to drive her husband to the library with his glass of claret, and she makes the more intelligent of her daughters wince. Yet, she’s a mother who has the interests of her children at heart.

In a time when the state of women was inextricably tied to their husbands and in a household where there was not sufficient money for reasonable dowries for five girls, and living in an estate that will go to a distant cousin on the death of her husband, Mrs. Bennet wants to get her girls married and married well. How else can she take care of them?

Mrs. Bennet assumes that Mr. B. will pop off before she does, although he reassures her, “My dear, do not give way to such gloomy thoughts. Let us hope for better things. Let us flatter ourselves that I may be the survivor.”

She doesn’t get a lot of support from that quarter. Within this household, the ditzy mother is the one who’s worried about her daughters’ future. For some reason, Mr. Bennet seems quite sanguine about the whole thing.

Granted, Mrs. Bennet does not go about the business of getting her daughters married off in the best of all possible ways. She tries to get Mr. Bennet to make Elizabeth marry Mr. Collins, the obsequious heir to Longbourn:

She would not give him time to reply, but hurrying instantly to her husband, called out as she entered the library, “Oh! Mr. Bennet, you are wanted immediately; we are all in an uproar. You must come and make Lizzy marry Mr. Collins, for she vows she will not have him, and if you do not make haste he will change his mind and not have her.”

And when her youngest runs off with the ne’er-do-well Mr. Wickham without benefit of marriage, she first reacts in a typically Mrs. Bennetish manner:

Mrs. Bennet, to whose apartment they all repaired, after a few minutes conversation together, received them exactly as might be expected: with tears and lamentations of regret, invectives against the villanous conduct of Wickham, and complaints of her own sufferings and ill-usage; blaming everybody but the person to whose ill-judging indulgence the errors of her daughter must be principally owing.

She recovers admirably when Lydia is recovered and a marriage is effected: “My dear, dear Lydia!” she cried. “This is delightful indeed! She will be married! I shall see her again! She will be married at sixteen! My good, kind brother! I knew how it would be. I knew he would manage everything! How I long to see her! and to see dear Wickham too?”

When Elizabeth snags the big one, Mrs. B. is not to be repressed:

£5,000 a year!

Good gracious! Lord bless me! only think! dear me! Mr. Darcy! Who would have thought it? And is it really true? Oh, my sweetest Lizzy! how rich and how great you will be! What pin-money, what jewels, what carriages you will have! Jane’s is nothing to it — nothing at all. I am so pleased — so happy. Such a charming man! — so handsome! so tall! Oh, my dear Lizzy! pray apologise for my having disliked him so much before. I hope he will overlook it. Dear, dear Lizzy! A house in town! Everything that is charming! Three daughters married! Ten thousand a year! Oh, Lord! What will become of me? I shall go distracted.”

Yes, Mrs. Bennet, you’re a silly woman. You’re a trial to your husband and an embarrassment to your daughters but you’re a mother through and through. You want what’s best for the girls (and if that happens to be what’s best for you as well, that’s just icing on the cake) and by the end of the book you have three daughters married.  Happy Mother’s Day. Go buy yourself something nice. You know the best warehouses.

The Jane Austen Gazetteer at The Republic of Pemberley is a compendium of information about the locations in each of Jane Austen’s novels using period resources.  For example, the maps are from John Cary’s Maps of England from 1812 through 1818.  In putting these together, we also examined a great many travel guides and relied heavily on Kearsley’s Traveller’s Entertaining Guide through Great Britain.

Kearsley gives you the standard description of roads and cross-roads, distances from London and from other locations.  In addition it provides some historical and topographical information for many of the towns along the way.

bath-illusBath, for example, ” has been famous from the time of the Romans for its hot springs, the most remarkable in England and inferior to few in Europe: they are not only used as baths, but internally as a medicine; and great benefit is derived from them in gouty, paralytic, bilious and other cases. The reputation of these waters is so much increased that Bath is become the principal resort, next to the metropolis, for persons of rank and fortune and for the constant residence of opulent invalids as well as numerous votaries of dissipation. In splendour and elegance of buildings it exceeds every town in England, being constructed of a white stone of which the surrounding soil is chiefly composed. It is seated on the river Avon in a valley, and, from the reflection of the sun’s rays from the white soil, it is very hot in summer. The principal seasons for the waters are spring and autumn. The poor, who come here to drink them, may be received in a magnificent hospital. It is supposed to be very ancient. King Edgar was crowned here. On the l. is Prior-park, lord Hawarden.”  Then it goes on to list the York Hotel, White Hart, White Lion, Lamb as places you might want to stay.

brighton-illusAbout Brighton (or Brightelmstone as it was known), Kearsley writes, “Brighthelmston was a poor town inhabited chiefly by fishermen; but having for some years past become a fashionable place of resort, on account of its convenience for bathing, it has been enlarged by many handsome new buildings. The Steine , a fine lawn between the town and the sea forms a beautiful and favourite resort for the company. Here Charles II embarked for France in 1651 after the battle of Worcester. Great flocks of sheep are fed on the neighbouring hills . This town is sometimes called Brighton. It is the station of the packet boats to and from Dieppe in time of peace . The prince of Wales has a bathing residence here.”

oxford-1793

Oxford

Oxford, according to Kearsley, is “a celebrated university, and a bishop’s see. Besides the cathedral it has thirteen parish churches. It is seated at the confluence of the Thames and Cherwell, on an emininence. The town is three miles in circumference, and is of a circular form. It consists chiefly of two spacious streets, crossing each other in the middle of the town. The university is said to have been founded by the immortal Alfred, receiving from him many privileges and large revenues. Here are twenty colleges and five halls, several of which are in the streets, and give the city an air of magnificence. The colleges are Univeristy, Baliol, Merton, Exeter, Oriel, Queen’s, Nw, Lincoln, All-Souls, Magdalen, Brasenose, Corpus Christi, Christchurch, Trinity, St. John Baptist’s, Jesus, Wadham, Pembroke, Worcester, and Hertfrod. The halls are Alban, Edmund, St. Mary’s, New Inn, and ST. Mary Magdalen. All travellers agree in confessing that there is not such another group of buildings nor such another university in the world.” While there, you might stay at Star, Cross, King’s Arms, Angel, &c..

Kearsley’s is not the only guide to provide this kind of information.  Paterson’s Roads also interrupts the long lists of towns on each road with descriptions of various places of interest. Cary’s New Itinerary is mostly just an itinerary.  The descriptions found in Cary concern which buildings you’ll pass on a particular route (not unlike “take the second left after the Dunkin Donuts”).  Most guides also provide the traveller with a list of available inns.  And these are not all.  You might like to take a look at A Guide to All the Watering and Sea Bathing Places for 1813 or Crosby’s Complete Pocket Gazetteer of England and Wales.  Poke around Google Books.  You’ll be amazed at the number of travel guides to be had.

 

Megan and I are at the RWA New England Chapter Conference this weekend.  We will be celebrating Romance Writers (mostly women) of the 21st century.  We’ll also be hanging out with Romance Writers of the 21st century and going to some great workshops, including a master class with Julia Quinn on dialogue (at which she is, indeed, a master).  While we’re going to workshops with women writers of the 21st century, I thought it might be nice to give you a glimpse of women writers of the 18th and early 19th century.

Chawton House

Chawton House

Chawton House Library was founded in 1996 by Sandy Lerner in the home owned by Jane Austen’s brother, Edward Knight in Chawton England.  After years of  restoration, it became the home of a extensive library of women’s writing in English 1600 to 1830.

According to the site, “Writers whose work is held in the collection include Penelope Aubin, Aphra Behn, Frances Burney, Maria Edgeworth, Eliza Haywood, Charlotte Lennox, Hannah More, Sydney Owenson, Ann Radcliffe, Mary Robinson, Mary Shelley, Frances Sheridan, Charlotte Smith and Mary Wollstonecraft, and many more both well-known and lesser-known writers, as well as a significant number of anonymous works.”

Fortunately for us, Chawton House Library has made many of these texts available on line and continues to add to their digital collection.  You’ll find the Georgian/Regency era represented among the novels available.  If you’d like to visit the library in person, it is open to the public.  Anyone may apply for a reader’s pass.

In addition to this extraordinary resource, Chawton House and its farm has been restored to its 18th century condition using traditional methods.  The farm is also run on 18th century methods.  It is an easy walking distance to Chawton Cottage, Jane Austen’s last home and the site of the Jane Austen;s House Museum.  If you’re in the area (and don’t we wish we were?), Chawton House Library  offers a wide variety of events that illuminate the period in which we read and write.

It’s well worth a virtual visit.  Enjoy.

Georgian-JewelleryBecause it’s a holiday weekend and I’m running a bit late, you get a short post  with lots of pretty pictures.  Today, we’re looking at Jewelry  of our era.  The information and pictures are from Georgian Jewellery 1714-1830, a gorgeously illustrated overview of Georgian jewels.

Click on any of the thumbnails to get a larger image of the various pieces.

Cameo & Intaglio - 1800

Cameos and intaglios are lumped together because they’re both made from carving stone.  The difference is that in cameos, the design stands out and in intaglios it’s carved into the surface.  agate, onyx, malachite and lapis were the stones of choice because of the their natural bands of color.

Opaline Glass - 1800

Opaline glass or opal paste was made in Derbyshire and in France.  This was a milky glass in which cooling during its manufacture caused a separation of various oxidex.  Opaline glass was a favorite for daytime wear.

Diamonds - 1800

Diamonds. There is much to be said about diamonds and probably not much that needs saying.  During our period, the table cut (flat on the top, faceted on the sides) of the 16th and 17th centuries was superseded by the rose cut (many different shaped and sized facets over a small culet, allowing the least amount of light to escape through the bottom of the stone.

Gold Woven Chain - 1800The chain was a particularly Georgian piece of jewelry.  It could be woven, knitted, engraved or stamped out links.  It would frequently feature a distinctive clasp.  There was a seemingly endless array of option.  Besides the gold, the chains were made out of silver and other materials such as iron, steel, gilt metal and pinchbeck.

Fine-cut steel - 1800Steel was an interesting jewel choice during the Georgian period.  The steel was fine cut and highly polished and primarily a night-time adornment as it reflected candle-glow particulary well.  Queen Charlotte wore a cut-steel chain made by Matthew Boulton.

Seed pearls 1810Seed pearls, tiny natural pearls from India were an essential part of Georgian jewelry.  They were used in a variety of ways:  long tasseled sautoirs, threaded into intricate designs on slides or clasps, used as surrounds for gemstones.

Iron and Steel 1815

Iron is probably not the first metal that jumps to mind when thinking about jewelry but black-lacquered cast iron jewelry was made by the Royal Berlin Foundry beginning in 1804 and became fashionable during the Napoleonic Wars.  It was made by moulding shapes into wax, impressing them in fine sand and then filling the impressions with molten iron.  Once cooled, it was usually lacquered black.

Coral 1820Coral had a brief period as jewelry desired for both day and evening wear.  It came in the form of cameos, carved rosettes, acorns, or cherubs’ heads, and beads carved in facets or crosshatched. In the early 1800s it was even paired with diamonds for evening dress.

PastePaste – It’s more than just something to replace the jewels you’ve pawned to support your gambling habit.  Much of the paste used in jewelry during the Georgian era was celebrated as jewels in their own right.   Paste was highly regarded because the stones could be cut into any shape required for a setting.  There are still some beautiful examples of fine paste jewelry.

Wedgwood & steel 1780Wedgwood jewelry is distinctly English.  Josiah Wedgwood’s ceramic-ware plaques were included in brooches, pendants, rings, buckles, clasps and earrings.  Mathew Boulton of Birmingham used jasperware ceramic, with its soft matte finish set into gold, silver, marcasite or cut-steel.  The beaded necklaces are particularly lovely.

Okay,  not death.  But let’s talk about taxes since most of us  in the U.S. are getting pretty near the deadline for submitting our annual tax returns.

While we’re never happy about paying taxes, I thought it might be a good time to think about the taxes we’re not paying that our heroes and heroines probably faced during the Regency.

window-taxOne of the most widely known taxes during our period was the window tax. The window tax was introduced in 1691  and lasted until 1851.  That’s a lot of windows.   The tax was imposed upon every inhabited dwelling house in England (and Wales),  except cottages. That is,  houses not paying to church and poor rates in a parish.  By 1792, the rates ran from 6 shillings and 6 pence for houses with six windows or less to houses with 180 windows or more for which the charge was 93 pounds 2 shillings and 6 pence, with 3 shillings charged for every window over that number.  As you might imagine, this led to a lot of bricked-up windows.

Another interesting tax – and one we don’t have to worry about – is g14powderthe tax on hair powder, introduced in 1795.  After May 5 of that year, very person in Great Britain using hair-powder was required to enter his name at one of the stamp offices and to take out an annual certificate which proved he had paid the tax of one guinea (One pound plus one shilling).  exemptions to the tax included the royal family and their servants; clergymen with an income under £100 a year, officers in the navy under the rank of commander, subalterns, non-commissioned officers, and privates in the army, artillery, militia, marines, engineers, and fencibles.  Exemptions were also made for families with large number of ladies. A father with two or more unmarried daughters could obtain a certificate for any numbers of hair-powder users in his household, provided he paid for the use of the powder by two people.  The government hoped that the tax would raise a revenue of £200,000 per year.  Instead, people stopped powdering their hair and, in the first year, it raised only £210.136.

sidesaddle1The tax on “establishments of horses ” was introduced in 1784. It exempted, at first, horses used for agricultural purposes and was imposed only upon  “pleasure horses kept for amusement.” For every horse kept and used “for the saddle” or for “driving in a carriage” (which again, another taxable item) a tax of 10 shillings per year was levied.   1805 the taxation had been increased considerably. For one horse kept for pleasure the tax imposed was 2 pounds 17 shillings and 6 pence. For two horses, 4 pounds,14 shillings and 6 pence (that is 9 pounds 9 shillings for two), and so on along a sliding scale to an establishment of 20 or more horses where a tax of 6 pounds and 12 shillings was charged for every saddle or carriage horse.  The result of this was not that people stopped keeping pleasure horses but that, frequently, they rode horses meant for agricultural purposes.  See, for example, Mrs. Bennet co-opting Mr. Bennet’s farm horse to send Jane to Netherfield in the rain in Pride & Prejudice.

running_footmanIn 1777,  an annual tax of a guinea per man was imposed on male servants.  According to Pamela Horne in The Complete Servant, “Although originally intended to help finance the war of American Independence, it was retained in modified form until 1937. In addition between 1795 and 1869 a tax on hair powder was levied and this, too, added to the cost of employing footmen and coachmen in full regalia.”

These are just a sample of the taxes in existence during our period.  You might also like to investigate the tax on the home consumption of pepper. Or how about raisins?  Or the tax levied from 1784 to 1811 on men’s hats.  Pitt the Younger seemed to be the driving force behind many of the more interesting taxes.

Posted in Regency, Research | 2 Replies