Back to Top

Category: Writing

Posts in which we talk about the writing craft and process

I think it was the fine folks over at Dear Author who coined the phrase “Mistorical” to describe historical romances that are, for lack of a better term, light on the accuracy. “Wallpaper Historical” is a similar term. Mistorical, I believe, is intended to describe not just books that are light on the factual accuracy, but books that appear to be set in a world that never existed. It’s a Meta-Regency setting as opposed to an actual-Regency setting.

The term mistorical is a bit perjorative in that it implies something that is wrong — hence the Latin prefix mis. There is a suggestion in there that perhaps the author is not aware of any errors. Although I think that’s true for some authors, I’m not sure about that as a blanket statement.

The Meta-Regency

The meta-Regency is, for me, a world that never existed and, moreover, is a world that the author and reader very likely both understand did not exist. The stories are built on a set of Regency signifiers that the savvy reader instantly recognizes and navigates.

It’s a world where a woman’s Empire gown can be removed by unfastening a few hooks, no one goes to Church or is genuinely afraid for their immortal soul, and no one blinks an eye when a woman demands to know why she can’t go to Oxford, as if the unfairness ought to be patently obvious (even though, historically, the “fairness” of that prohibition was so obvious as to not need discussion). Reform is in the air and the hero supports it. There may well be sexy lingerie, even though sexy underwear didn’t exist. There are horses and carriages, slippers and ballrooms, eleven o’clock tea and the use of the word “rather” in place of the modern intensifier of “fucking.” I rather think that’s awesome, my lord instead of Dude. That’s fucking awesome.

A Less Meta-Regency

Then there’s the historicals that exist in a Regency constructed through use of a greater set of known facts. In this sort of historical you are unlikely to find a heroine who decides to dispense with her corset in the name of fashion. This heroine might recognize the unfairness of not being allowed to go to Oxford, but she will also be aware that the weight of public conviction is against a change in the policy.

These books tend to explore the impact and meaning of these very real power legal and cultural imbalances and the ways in which the hero and heroine can both transgress those boundaries.

Tomayto Tomahto?

While I enjoy and tend to prefer historicals that are strong on the history, I also enjoy historicals that appear to be set in this Meta-Regency period. I have read and re-read certain “Wallpaper” historicals multiple times.

I’ve reached the point, however, where I don’t feel these two kinds of books should be lumped together at all. When I’m in the mood for the Meta-Regency, I wish I knew a quick way to find one, other than by author name. And when I want a book that gives me a more historically accurate grounding, I wish I could more easily find them, too.

There’s nothing worse than finding out you’ve just paid money for a Historical romance only to find you have a meta-Regency world instead.

So, where do you stand? Do you have a preference? Do you care? Opine in the comments.

I am behind on my book so today you get this boring post plus some pictures. What the hey.

OK, wait, I have a better idea. Tell me in the comments what you’re reading now. Love? Hate? Meh?

I am reading Sherry Thomas’s The Bride Of Larkspear. It’s the erotic novel written by a character in one of her books and given to another character in one of her books and it’s really awesome so far. It’s self-pubbed, by the way. The two characters involved in the dirty book exchange are the hero and heroine of her current release, Temptintg the Bride. I haven’t yet read Tempting the Bride, it’s sitting in my Kindle. But it is the most amazing experience reading this novella and knowing I have the whole story yet to uncover.

It’s really fun and dirty and all the lovely emotion of Thomas.

Other reading includes Sherman Alexie’s Blasphemy. I am savoring the stories.

I bought a collection of erotica by an author I won’t mention.  Fail. I got confused in the first paragraph and then gave up after trying twice to make sense of it. The weird thing is, the writing wasn’t bad — it wasn’t the incoherent mess that can pop up in books you strongly suspect did not go through an editorial process. But she was plainly attempting to show off and you know what? No. How about you read what you wrote and fix it?

On that note, over at the Popular Romance blog, I wrote a post about the origins of the worst writing advice ever. (Did you see what I did there? I am very smooth.)

Here is a picture of a metal peacock:

This is a photo from nature. Which I took myself.

 

An Often Terrifying Journey

I’m just about done with my next paranormal (Book 5 in the My Immortals series): My Darkest Passion. To the point where it’s time to start thinking about prepping for the next book, which will be the first of the sequels to Lord Ruin. For anyone who may have read LR, this first sequel will be about Lucy and Thrale. Unless I change my mind.

At least now I have enough knowledge about my writing self that, although it’s always daunting to start a new book, I have a process that’s gotten me through going on 20 books now. I also have a system, sort of. However, I wouldn’t go so far as to say I have a plan. That would be an insult to people who actually do plan.

The last several months, I’ve been immersed in the paranormal; the contemporary world, but with demons and witches and the like. I don’t have to worry about vocabulary much or clothes, or architecture. I’m always surprised at the things that crop up that need research. Part of the story takes place in San Diego, a city I have been two maybe three times, but always on business. Never for research or fun. Twitter to the rescue for my questions about San Diego– Tweeples who actually live in San Diego! And then, Google Maps, Street View, Google images to take a more targeted look at the terrain. Everything else takes place pretty much in my backyard. (Not literally, just figuratively.)

Actually, there ARE vocabulary issues. There some small but crucial differences in idiom between Northern California and Southern California, and they instantly identify someone as being from up north or down south. And, it gives away writers who put the wrong words in a Nor Cal person’s mouth. Or vice versa.

Whatever Works, Right?

For my historicals, I start with the same base set of computer files. My handy chronology of Regency Events, for example, the files I use when writing (chapter, cast of characters, chapter outline… except, I didn’t do an outline at all for the last three or four books…) I have a store of research books, analog and digital, and I’ll generally flip through my materials on fashion and architecture, just to get in the mood. Such swoony gowns! Mostly, I start mulling over my hero and heroine. What’s the deal with them? What draws them together and/or pulls them apart? What scenes will show that happening?

Since this one will be a sequel, I’ll re-read Lord Ruin and refresh my memory about the details of the story. What clues might there be in the book about where Lucy and Thrale are headed?

Confession

Actually, with Lucy and Thrale, I happen to know a fair amount, as it kept popping up while I was writing Lord Ruin. It’s odd how clearly I recall the things I ended up knowing about her that I also knew were about her story, not Anne and Ruan’s. Thrale, too.

Another Confession

I dislike starting out. My desk is never so tidy as when I am engaging in behavior that avoids this. The initial words are all so thin and wimpy. I know that eventually they won’t be, but still. So much of writing seems to be about fixing the not-good-parts.

So, in the next couple of weeks I’ll be jumping into writing The Next Historical. I know enough about my writing process that I know it’s a jump. Right into the deep end. I try to start in the middle as it tends to save me from having to delete the first five chapters. I figure I’ve done well if it turns out I actually need to add — or is that pre-add? Well, whatever. I guess we’ll see out it turns out!

Which is why the planning sort of writer probably feels a bit woozy right now.

Tuesday night I was unable to get to the Risky site to finalize my post (an interview with Susan Broadwater of The Regency Library.)  Unfortunately, I leave for work before 6 AM and that means I couldn’t get back to this until now.

I have Susan’s post scheduled for next Wednesday. I’m putting up an awesome giveaway, so make sure you check out the post.

In the meantime, here’s a picture of tulips.

Photo by Yours Truly

Photo by Yours Truly