Back to Top

Tag Archives: Jane Austen


Today the Riskies welcome Christine Merrill, a fellow Harlequin Historical author, whose Dangerous Lord, Innocent Governess is in bookstores this month and available online.

Dangerous Lord, Innocent Governess was an entertaining historical romance with a gothic touch, a plot with some twists and turns and a nice romance…”–The Bookaholic Cat

“I enjoyed this book…It was sexy, dark and satisfying. 4 stars.”–Red Hot Books

Christine will give away one copy of Dangerous Lord, Innocent Governess and one copy of Lady Drusilla’s Road to Ruin to two lucky commenters chosen at random.

Welcome, Christine! Tell us about Dangerous Lord, Innocent Governess.
In Miss Winthorpe’s Elopement, my hero, Adam, had an unfortunate past with his best friend Tim’s wife. I think I had half a plan that Tim and Claire would rekindle their relationship in a second book and live happily ever after. But the more I learned about her, the more natural it seemed for her to die in a mysterious fall down the stairs, and for Tim to be the prime suspect in her murder.

Daphne is Claire’s cousin, and was one of the few people who was genuinely fond of her. She insinuates herself into the household to find out the truth. But she doesn’t count on having real feelings for the children she’s pretending to care for, or her attraction to Tim.
What captivated you most about this story?
I wanted to do a Gothic, with a governess heroine and a brooding hero. And if possible I wanted to work in as many of the old conventions, with Daphne sneaking around an old dark house, barefoot and in a nightgown, in the thrall of a hero who might kiss or kill her. But I wanted a heroine who wasn’t quite as spineless as the ones I remember from my youthful reading. I was plotting it out about six months before I could work it into the writing schedule, and had a lot of fun creating my version of the stories I read back in the 70’s.
What is Risky about Dangerous Lord, Innocent Governess?
It’s really a pretty dark story, and the characters are not always likeable. I know that Tim Colton has a marshmallow center, and loves his kids. But he’s pretty messed up through most of the book, bitter, suicidal, and definitely capable of murder. Although Daphne grows to be a better woman by the end of the book, she’s been listening to the advice given by the faithless Claire, and begins as a shallow, willful brat. The first love scene between them can hardly be called that. But I don’t think either one of them is capable of love at that point.
Did you discover anything interesting when you were researching the story?
My hero is a botanist, and I assumed he would have his own glass house. But I wasn’t totally sure what that entailed, or what would be grown there. I learned that English gardening was a pretty sophisticated pastime, with fruits forced out of season, all the way back in the time of Queen Elizabeth I. John Nash, a popular architect of the Regency period, did some very nice conservatories and orangeries and Thomas Hopper redid the conservatory at Carlton house.
Tim Colton’s imaginary glass house is a bit more functional then that. But it would have had a glass ceiling and some very nice cast iron columns to support the windows.
I understand you also have a book out this month in the Uk. Tell us about that one.
This month’s UK book is Lady Drusilla’s Road to Ruin. It’s the second book in the Ladies in Disgrace trilogy which will be out in the US in spring of next year. John Hendricks was personal secretary to the hero in the first book, Lady Folbroke’s Delicious Deception, and he’s leaving London broken hearted, drunk and unemployed.
Drusilla is headed north on same the mail coach, trying to rescue her little sister from a disastrous elopement with a dancing master. When she hires John to help her, she learns how much fun it can be to lose one’s reputation on the road to Gretna Green.
What is next for you?
I’ve just started working on a new book with an actor hero. Jack, who is a bit of a con man, is pretending to be a member of the nobility, trying to marry an heiress for her money. He ends up with Cynthia, who thinks she is tricking him into marriage and is trying to get his nonexistent fortune.
They end up joining forces against common enemies, and repairing the fortunes of both their families by any conniving and underhanded means possible. They are both totally devious. I think they make a lovely couple.

Anyone still have a taste for Gothics? Do you have a favorite? And what can be done to buck up all those too stupid to live Gothic heroines of the 70’s?

Two lucky commenters will win today! One, Dangerous Lord, Innocent Governess; One, Lady Drusilla’s Road to Ruin

First, due to popular request, here’s a pic from a few years ago when my children and I trick or treated as Hermione, her cat Crookshanks and Professor McGonagall.

Now back to my regularly scheduled post…

I’ve heard some readers say they skip sex scenes, but I’ve never done so. Once I’ve decided to read a book, I want to take it all in the way the author intended it. Otherwise, I’m afraid I’ll miss something. At an RWA workshop given by Julia Ross, she said something to the effect that if readers skipped her sex scenes, they’d have no idea what was going on. That’s how it should be. Sex scenes should not be skippable!

Sometimes I’ve found my attention wandering while reading a sex scene, though usually this happens in a book in which I’m already losing interest and may not finish. This happens if the hero and heroine seem like a generic romance couple. I love deep characterization and I don’t believe one can isolate the body from the mind from the heart. To me, sex scenes are a way to show the whole tangle, and that’s what makes them so much fun to read and write. In a well-written sex scene, the sex is never just a physical act and the characters remain true to themselves. That makes the sex more real and more exciting. What they do can be inventive or not; it just has to make sense for them.

So maybe some readers skip sex scenes when the characterization falters. On the other hand, I’ve heard some of the sex-scene-skippers say they just don’t want to be in someone else’s bedroom. I think that’s a matter of reading style. If you like to read about the hero and heroine, you might feel like an intruder. When I’m reading romance, I want to be the heroine and fall in love with the hero. So I don’t feel like an unwanted third party, even if the scene is in the hero’s point of view (which I really like reading and writing sometimes).

How about you? Do you ever skip sex scenes? Why or why not? Do you like sex scenes written in heroine or hero point of view, or either?

Elena


Some of you (okay, most of you) likely indulged in the deliciousness of Masterpiece Theater’s airing of Downton Abbey.

In it, Violet, Dowager Countess of Grantham, eyeballs the new heir–the sadly middle-class Matthew Crawley–and asks, with perfect seriousness, “What is a weekend?”

Oh, wow. Can you imagine not looking forward to Friday afternoon, and not having dread on Sunday evening? Not even thinking about a difference between, say, Wednesday and Saturday?

For all of us, I’d say, that is an impossible dream. So with that in mind, let’s tell Violet what a weekend is, and what we plan to do with it. I’ll start:

I am having a few friends over to watch North and South. Again. There will be swooning over Richard Armitage, some snacks, and perhaps more swooning over Nicholas, the rougher bit in N&S.

I will be catching up on True Blood; I’m two episodes behind.

Reading–currently engrossed in Stacia Kane’s City of Ghosts, hope to dive into one of the many Mary Baloghs I’ve got on the TBR pile.

Walking–now that I’m working, I sit a whole damn lot, and I hate it. I hope to get to the gym, too.

I will not be drinking ratafia, bossing the servants around, or bemoaning my lack of an Almack’s invite.

What are you doing?

Megan

Our guest today is Kate Dolan who writes traditional Regency romances for Blush (formerly Cerridwen) Cotillion as well as a variety of other totally unrelated books and articles. Her third Regency, Deceptive Behavior, comes out today in ebook format. And she shares her home with both dogs and a rabbit. That’s her version, so I’ll add that she’s a brilliant and productive writer, a very well-informed historian, and a good friend and critique partner. The thing I love about Kate’s books is that she includes some very risky topics and that makes her a natural here.

So naturally she’s chosen a very non-PC topic. And, oh yes, she’s offering a free download of Deceptive Behavior or one of her print backlist to one lucky person.

For the third book in my “Love and Lunacy” series, I wanted a hero who was a bit different. The challenge was to devise characteristics that would make him seem odd and even unmanly to those in Regency society, but still masculine and appealing to modern readers. He needed to be athletic, but without engaging in the traditional exercise of gentleman, such as hunting and fencing.

I made him a fast runner, but Regency gentlemen did not compete in track meets, so I needed a reason for him to run – and chasing after the heroine didn’t count.

Then I remembered a sport introduced to my husband by one of his colleagues: beagling.

Definitely doesn’t sound very masculine, does it? The sport is very similar to fox hunting, but the quarry is a hare and it is usually chased on foot. So by making my hero a beagler, I gave him an opportunity to become a good runner.

Modern hunts tend to proceed rather slowly with the field walking along behind the beagles, but sources indicate that it used to be a running sport. The Trinity Foot Beagles, a history of a Cambridge club written in 1912, is full of cartoons of men running and the theme song of the group includes a verse that says “It’s the deuce of a run, And I’m pretty well done…It’s lucky by gad, For I think every lad, Has pretty well used up his breath.”

Beagling is now outlawed in the U.K. as a blood sport, but it still has aficionados in the U.S. While clubs such as the Roscommon Hounds proclaim that it “is a dark day if anything is ever killed” during a chase, that too was obviously not true in the past. The lines I deleted from the quote from the Trinity Foot Beagles song talk about the quarry being near its death, and later lines describe the hounds “breaking up” the “pussy,” which was apparently the term of affection for the rabbit that was chased and ripped to shreds.

While “pussy’s death knell” might have a place in some romance stories, it really didn’t fit a traditional Regency, so I was fortunate that in my story I never had to depict an actual outing. My hero did chase a rabbit for a few hundred yards, but then the rabbit stopped so there wasn’t much challenge after that. (Rabbits in my yard do this all the time. They run away frantically and then just stop in the middle of the yard, somehow thinking my dogs and I can no longer see them.)

The Trinity Beagles history describes a “most rotten joyless day” of chasing a hare through turnip patches in the November drizzle, losing the quarry twice and finally giving up after at least 45 minutes of running. “And yet,” the author notes philosophically, “where there is no disappointment, there is no sport. Good days are those which exceed expectation, or they would not be good; and the red letters of the good days would not stand out in bold relief were there not the deep black shadows of the rotten, joyless ones.”

This is of course true for more than just beagling, or any other sport—it applies to everything.
So I wish you many red letter days, but remember that there is an important purpose served by the “rotten, joyless days” as well.

Please weigh in on the advantages or disadvantages of having characters who engage in pursuits now no longer socially acceptable (and we don’t mean with each other), and how do you think this is best handled when writing about such a bloodthirsty age? Or, tell us your favorite dog or rabbit stories. We’ll pick a winner tomorrow!